This thread is over two years old and may be outdated. Please create a new thread if you need help, or email us if you have an active Premium license.

Header in Internet Explorer

Resolved 3 replies premiumthemetheme-vantage
10 years ago · Last reply by Andrew Misplon 10 years ago

I had tweaked the header so that the logo and background finally looked perfect, at least in Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. The client recently sent a screen-grab of the site in Internet Explorer (not sure of the version) and it looked like this, http://annehutchinswebdesign.com/FILES/ggg-header-IE.png. I’m on a Mac so I don’t have access to Internet Explorer (I wish everyone would just dump this crappy browser once and for all).

Is there IE-specific CSS code that I can add to fix this? I really don’t want to tweak the background any further, particularly when it looks great on the other browsers. Help!

URL: http://girlygirlgalas.com/ggg2015/

This is our free support forum. Replies can take several days.

Need fast email support? Get SiteOrigin Premium

Replies

3
  1. annehweb 10 years, 6 months ago

    On a whim, I extended the width of the browser window and the logo merged with the flower graphics, so it’s not an IE problem. I had so much trouble with this graphical background and now this — which is why I HATE graphical backgrounds. The background graphic is 1920 × 235 and it’s set to Cover. Any suggestions on how to fix this?

  2. annehweb 10 years, 6 months ago

    Never mind — I ended up tweaking the header graphic AGAIN to accommodate huge monitors. Grrr, what a pain. No fault of the Vantage theme, though :-)

  3. Andrew Misplon Staff 10 years, 6 months ago

    Hi Anne

    Sorry we weren’t able to reply sooner. Glad to hear you made progress.

    If you need any help moving forward, feel free to comment here and I’ll jump in.

    All the best.

Replies on this thread are closed.

Please create a new thread if you have a question, or purchase a SiteOrigin Premium license if you need one-on-one email support.

Have a different question or issue?

Start New Thread